The retraction incident has made the latest progress.
On April 21, the China Association for Science and Technology published an official website saying that on April 18, the China Association for Science and Technology held talks with Springer on the retraction event. The person in charge of the press said that the incident was not aimed at Chinese scholars. It was 2015. Follow-up of the retraction event. Springer also acknowledged that journal editors have not strictly reviewed the review of expert information and review opinions, and have already dismissed the journal cooperation.
Related reading: 107 SCI paper peer review fraud: the exclusive response of the president of the top three hospitals
Two days later, the retraction message was sent.
What are the research institutions and authors involved in this shocking retraction incident? What is the subject of the research involved? What kind of journal is Tumor Biology involved? We performed a visual interpretation through bibliometric analysis.
The retracted article has been cited 760 times
The 107 papers that were retracted were published in 2012-2016, with 2014 (43 papers, 40%) and 2015 (33 papers, 31%). From the time point of view, it can be said that all are old texts.
The longer the year of retraction, the greater the impact. As of today, the total number of these 107 papers has been cited 767 times, and according to past experience, even after being retracted, these papers will continue to be cited by unsuspecting authors.
The more embarrassing thing, the one with the highest citation (Wang Fei, 2014), was cited 67 times in the past two years, and ranked 37th in all the 7685 papers in the journal, ranking among the top ranked subjects in the discipline. 1% of the small gold cup paper (Highly Cited Paper by SCI).
ZHEJIANG SHENDASIAO MEDICAL INSTRUMENT CO.,LTD. , https://www.sdsmedtools.com